Tuesday, September 4, 2007

Paint

New Orleans existed before anyone knew it as New Orleans, before time and man claimed it. I can not avoid thinking of this city now as independent of it’s people, it is a city that does not need buildings, roads, or police. When any native speaks of it, they can not describe what makes this home, jazz may be the closest anyone has ever gotten to understanding it, and I am also lost in the middle and as of now I don't wish to understand either. Perhaps that is what makes this place so special.
I drove into Central City on my first visit by accident, and without knowing it I saw New Orleans. Between my home in the Bywater and there, we are only separated by space and paint. A fresh coat of paint on my Shotgun separates my neighborhood from theirs, but in this simple act color has pushed people further apart again as some can afford to paint and others can’t. Yet as some neighborhoods desaturate towards a monochromatic gray, their identities remain colorful on the street fronts, on porches, and in the neutral grounds. While some houses are repaired, others are being repaired, and others remain tattered, residents are not bound by the condition of repair to inform their cosmology. Instead, they seem to rely on nothing. People do not make this place because it exists without them, as homes still exists without fresh paint, as people still live without homes. I am separated by paint yet this difference is irrelevant, because repair is a natural condition and ‘place’ is a natural occurrence. Therefore to describe this place becomes useless since language is paint, it is only a condition of repair, an evolutionary event that doesn’t conclude with any finality, only questions.
The natural state of things has it so that my life is naturally separated from others who live miles away or even blocks away, therefore I can not possibly understand their position as my body can not be in two places at once. Architecture attempts to do this, it attempts at place making, but perhaps New Orleans has already solved the problem. Looking towards this city as a model for architects, the people have painted an invisible yet colorful way of living without intention or dogmatic visions. It is not an organic condition but it acts as an artifact whose meaning shifts with context and condition, it’s residue is the content because it is a city looking backwards to find meaning. In between cracks I have found more in this city than an entire childhood at home. Perhaps because I am forced to since it is a city made of cracks, alleys, and corners. Liminal space is invalid in New Orleans because it aggregates the city and the people, the ‘in-between’ is everywhere.
As a nomadic resident I only know this city as I see it now. Scaffolding is everywhere, repair is constant, and I am never sure of the distinction between what was and what is. But that doesn't really matter here as I try to move beyond what I know into what I see and experience.
What I see and feel differ, because I see run down houses yet I have romantic visions of what the house has seen. I see ornate roof details in the light and sweat from it. I feel intrigued by the history yet I am so hot that I can not imagine building it, and therefore feel disconnected from them, but I am in love with the condition. But that is the nature of place, and the nature of New Orleans.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

I know this is sarcasm, but pulling it off so well indicates that you are either a douche or really bored.

Anonymous said...

-there is no sarcasm here.

Anonymous said...

The term Ivory Tower designates a world or atmosphere where intellectuals engage in pursuits that are disconnected from the practical concerns of everyday life. As such, it has a pejorative connotation, denoting a willful disconnect from the everyday world; esoteric, over-specialized, or even useless research; and academic elitism, if not outright condescension by those inhabiting the proverbial ivory tower. In American English usage it ordinarily denotes the academic world of colleges and universities, particularly scholars of the humanities.

Anonymous said...

true, but it doesn't sound like someone in an Ivory Tower. Paint is a term which tells the story of this very situation. one can't be both scientist and observer. sarcasm is used as satire, as to tell a story through the eyes of a student and not an expert.

Anonymous said...

The main elements of the scientific method are:
characterization(quantify,OBSERVE,measure),hypothesis(theorize),Predict(logical reasoning from hypothesis), Experiment. So yes one can be a scientist and an observer, in fact it is part of what makes one a scientist.
This seems like satire, where you are taking a jab at the educated elite and their way of making broad sweeping statements, playing on emotions, but overall having little to say.
I know this is probably for some creative writing class, which is why it seems so forced, and probably get you a good grade, cause this is exactly what your teacher probably wants to see. Which only makes my arguement even stronger.

Anonymous said...

it's actually not very broad. it's about paint on houses. pretty specific.

Anonymous said...

It is broad. You took a simple idea on paint- "the only diffence between the poor and rich in New Orleans is a fresh coat of paint" and made it 604 words with sweeping statements that have little to do with the rest.

"New Orleans existed before anyone knew it as New Orleans, before time and man claimed it. I can not avoid thinking of this city now as independent of it’s people, it is a city that does not need buildings, roads, or police. When any native speaks of it, they can not describe what makes this home, jazz may be the closest anyone has ever gotten to understanding it, and I am also lost in the middle and as of now I don't wish to understand either. Perhaps that is what makes this place so special."

You know how you can tell this is meaningless, change New Orleans to New York, Amsterdam, or Tokyo. The passage still has as much truth. You have said nothing specific to anything here.

Liz said...

Jordan,
I see I've signed on to a debate already in place. I'd encourage those who comment to remain constructive. I won't comment on what these folks have said, but will offer up my thoughts on what you've written.

First, I think your approach to the assignment is quite engaging. Your writing is poetic in nature and I appreciate many of the descriptive phrases you've used: for instance, "desaturate towards a monochromatic gray," is an amazing way of describing some of the neighborhoods here. It indicates a sense of slow process.

I think you hint at alot of great ideas--the influence and meaning of jazz to the culture, the impact of painting a house, the inequality that exists and how this plays a part in rebuilding. I think you need more precision in your writing, however, for these ideas to read clearly. Perhaps elaborating with more concrete examples will balance the more abstract ideas you're bringing up. I think the reader needs something grounded in specific, concrete things in order to make the connections you're wishing to communicate. Also, watch the run-ons--these can be difficult to follow. Some other questions:

1. Do you really believe language is useless?
2. Even though you can never stand in another's shoes, isn't it still possible to have understanding? This might be a question that relates to your anthropology work. How do anthropologists understand the "other?"
3. What do you mean by "organic condition vs. artifact?"

I love the idea of the inbetween existing everywhere. I think this is very true and something worth pursuing. It also might be a perfect idea for clarifying these poetic hints and incorporating architectural observations at the same time.

Thank you for taking the time to write this blog. Liz

Anonymous said...

Liz,
The answer to question number 1 is:
yes language is truly useless, just look at this blog. Truly a useless waste of time.

andrew conway pedron said...

You know what is truly a waste of time? Your frequent checking of this blog and your comments. Seriously bud, get a life. Write your own blog, do your own thing, try to find something that excites or interests you, rather than attempting to cut Jordan down for his comments (which are original and insightful). Seriously, grow some balls (or if you're a female- the equivalent). Post your name and post your own thoughts so we can attack you equivocally.

Anonymous said...

Ask and ye shall receive.

http://bywaterdeluxesucks.blogspot.com/

Anonymous said...

Jordan,
remember the saying about the sincerest (spelling??) form of flattery...glad you have such a following.

Anonymous said...

http://www.bywaterdeluxesucks.blogspot.com

New Post, Check it out!!!